it's just theater. (jesus christ.)

January 19, 2013 | 01:56 PM | 1 note

David Greenspan: A Few Words About Little Lord

image

I met Michael Levinton when he was working as a producer at Target Margin Theater. During that time I saw his play, Balabustas, an adaptation of Women at the Thesmophoria – by far the funniest, most outrageous adaptation of an Aristophanes play I have ever seen – wonderfully vulgar, madcap and clever. Michael directed and acted in the production – and was such an engaging performer, David Herskovits and I cast him in Target Margin’s production of my play, Old Comedy – where he turned in a infectious performance as a very macho Hercules and very tart prostitute. When he founded Little Lord, I performed in his terrifically cheeky adaptation of Victor Herbert’s Babes in Toyland

If clever and cheeky was all Little Lord did it would be worth supporting simply for the good fun it provides. But (oh my god I am so) THIRST(y), Michael’s fanciful yet faithful production of Eugene O’Neill’s early play, Thirst, was not only irreverent, it was startlingly serious and moving – and emblematic of the company’s dedication, resourcefulness, intelligence and theatrical ingenuity. Little Lord’s upcoming Pocahontas promises to be great fun and splendidly subversive.

Michael and his cohorts deftly combine avant-garde techniques associated with companies like Target Margin and traditions derived from theatre of the ridiculous. It’s work well worth watching and well worth supporting.

Sincerely,

David Greenspan

Be our Pocahontas! Feed our show! donate directly to our upcoming show campaign HERE

Little Lord is a sponsored project of Fractured Atlas, a non-profit arts service organization. Contributions for the purpose of Little Lord must be made payable to Fractured Atlas and are tax-deductible to the extent permitted by law.

September 30, 2012 | 03:09 PM |

“MUNDUS NOVUS SPECTACULUS, FOR YOU! FOR YOU! FOR YOU!” No really, we made it for you.

SO, we’ve got a little glimpse of Pocahontas coming up, at Little Theatre at the not so little Dixon Place on October 8th. October 8th happens to be Columbus Day, or Discoverers’ Day, or Indigenous Peoples’ Day, or Day of Americas, whatever you want to call it. All of those work for us.

Michael and I have been working on a script. What does “working on a script” mean? It means I go to Michael’s house and we eat a lot of food, read early American melodramas and burlesques, make poems as if they were puzzles, using vocabulary we brainstormed in our residency at the Bushwick Starr, look at lots of old paintings, and if a joke makes us crack up, we keep it. Oh, and sometimes I record myself talking to myself in the bathtub, and Michael records himself talking to himself while he drives, and then we put that in the play. True story.

For this showing, we wanted to start with the beginning of the play and the “discovery” of America. Remember back in July when we were kicking around the phrase “to find a mundus novus?” Well, then we found this gem:

Source: Uploaded by user via Little Lord on Pinterest

This is Johannes Stradanus’ America, in which Amerigo Vespucci awakens a sleeping America.  History lesson time: It was actually Amerigo Vespucci who was the first man to “discover” America -Columbus thought he’d found Asia. WHOOPS! That’s why today we say, “Fuck yeah, America!” and not “Fuck yeah, Columbia!” Anyway, the inscription on the piece says:

Americus rediscovers America. He called her but once and thenceforth she was always awake.

Spooky right? That’s a naked feminized America being awakened by European discovery. It’s kind of gross and kind of pervy, plus it’s old-timey and has Latin engravings and maybe some cannibals in the background, so obviously we went nuts for it. 

Then we read The Odyssey, particularly the parts where Poseidon keeps trying to drown Odysseus. Just FYI, The Odyssey is way more fun when you read it aloud while switching between Irish and Baltimore accents.

Then we were thinking about sea monsters like this:

Source: upload.wikimedia.org via Little Lord on Pinterest

But really I was thinking about this:

Then we were like, should there be a mermaid? Yes. No. Yes. No. Maybe?

By the way, did you know that there is a difference between sirens and mermaids?

Mermaids are like this:

Sirens are like this:

Source: crystalinks.com via Little Lord on Pinterest

Crazy, yeah? So, right now, there’s NOT a mermaid, but mermaids plus mundus novus makes me think of this:

Only sometimes I get that song confused with this song:

(If you read this whole blog post, you will find a mashup of the two at the end.)

ANYWAY, then we looked at a lot of pictures like this:

Source: en.wikipedia.org via Little Lord on Pinterest

That’s Columbia. And this is the Landing of Columbus:

Source: aoc.gov via Little Lord on Pinterest

And then we ate a lot of food. This is the night before Yom Kippur. Delicious.

And that’s how we wrote this part of the play! So, please come to Dixon Place on 10/8 at 7:30pm, and see the beginnings of our pretty little Frankenstein monster of a show. Yes, Pocahontas will be there, too.

Oh, you might be wondering, “oh my g——-d, you guys, when will you ever put on the full production of this play?????” The answer is: MARCH! We’re on the Bushwick Starr’s website, along with some other very fine people, so it’s totes official. 

And now, a mashup:

Well, I didn’t say it was good mashup. See you at the show!

xoxoxo,

Laura von Holt

Associate Artistic Director

July 11, 2012 | 06:17 PM | 1 note

Day 12: It’s the Day of the Show, Y’all!

After three weeks in residence at the Bushwick Starr, it was time for our showing. We’ve been thinking about this play since 2009, and have done so much research, that by the time our residency came around, we’d kind of forgotten what show we wanted to make in the first place. So, we used the residency to distill the materials and sources we’d collected, and found a new way to connect to the material. We became very interested in America’s obsession with museums, and explored the way Americans use museums to display and personally connect to history. And so, what we created by the end of our residency was a kind of museum: a museum of our process, a museum about the story, and a museum about exploring the ways we might tell the story, complete with artifacts and cranky tour guides and weird rules and all. (Scroll down after this post to read more chronicles of our residency.)

***

Saturday afternoon was hot and steamy, and the weather app on my iPhone kept saying scary things like “feels like 106 degrees!” Still, we had air conditioning, cold beer, icy punch, and frozen fla-vor-ice, and about 45 hot and steamy people who made lovely party guests and an even lovelier audience. A tour of our belated birthday party for America and our burned museum:

We had very American decorations and served nostalgic American fare. Michael’s boyfriend put gherkins on the baloney sandwiches because he is an American genius.

This is Leah, modeling the spread. Actually, she was acting in this moment, but this is a fun way to show you all the food and decorations. One of the things we like to do is create a specific environment. We also like to display a lot of deliberate theatrical stuff in front of a lot of everyday crap. Is that a fridge behind your set? Nothing to see here, nothing to see here! MOVE ALONG!

We displayed artifacts from our burned museum:

That’s baby Uncle Sam and John Smith’s map of Virginia. Fancy!

Some sources from our library. Don’t touch them. Or read them.

And then we put on a show!

All hail Donya Washington, descendant of George Washington, now appearing as the magical talking mammy tree.

Here we are, trapped in a large pot filled with the state of Oklahoma. (What? We had to put in something that sounded “experimental.”)

I am Pocahontas, she of the 3-legged braids.

And see these beautiful Spirits of Patriotism? Those costumes started the show as table decorations. Behold, the magic of theater!

And here are some of the comments from our feedback forms:

WHAT IN THE PIECE STOOD OUT TO YOU?
  • - redacted emails
  • - the ensemble choral speech and the question of representation
  • - the emails (amazing/horrifying)
  • - mash up-i-ness, self-awareness, not too serious, not too coy, unison speaking
  • - sincerity, pain, abandonment, questionable journalism
  • - the emails from erstwhile collaborations
  • - the Help parody, the museum parody
WHAT WOULD YOU WANT TO SEE MORE OF?
  • - tableaux
  • - the “america as museum” idea is intriguing to me. do we respect our history, or just display it?
  • - taking those specific (anti) learning instructions we’ve all had in school and museums and recreating them in words and actions
  • - american history?
  • - pocahontas
  • - redacted emails
  • - more development of museum parody and the evolution of pocahontas
WHAT DO YOU EXPECT TO SEE WHEN YOU ATTEND A SHOW ENTITLED POCAHONTAS?
  • - subversive insight
  • - pocahontas
  • - braids and john smith
  • - at least one super cliche semi-racist hot native chick with tthat fucking headband and feather
  • - depends, does it also say “little lord”? if so, i expect to be delighted and offended
  • - braids, songs, disney
  • - the evolution of a myth and its ramifications
ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS?
  • - can’t wait for the final product
  • - well done. thank you. keep going
  • - captivating and entertaining
  • - recognition of fragmentary assorted nature of history very salient
  • - In Michael we trust
  • - beware inside jokes
If you have anything to add to these comments, please email us. America is for everyone(ish).

Thanks once again to the Bushwick Starr for hosting us, to the people who came to play with us, to our cheerful interns for their help, and to all the people who came to the event, and especially to whoever left all those $20 bills in the tip jar. Somehow, we always manage to hang out with just the loveliest people.

Now it’s time to re-group, and plan the next round. Stay tuned.

HAPPY BIRTHDAY AMERICA!

xoxo,

Laura von Holt, Associate Artistic Director

July 06, 2012 | 01:04 PM | 1 note

Day 9 & 10: We’ve got a script!

After a weekend off, we re-grouped on Tuesday with a rough draft of a script. It’s a lovely-funny-weird little playlette, and somehow incorporates a lot of the things we’ve created over the past few weeks. We play a lot with language, and even more with form, and somehow we’ve created a playlette that’s also a museum. Because we love museums. You know what else we love? Showing our work! Living the dream! If you’re around, please join us on Saturday from 3pm-6pm as we show our work and celebrate Happy Belated Birthday, ‘Merica! There will be beer, vodka punch, baloney sandwiches and bonnets!

Here’s a lot of Pocahontas books. Fuck yeah, research!

Here’s a lot of stuff for the showing and party…

…and here we are, rehearsing in bonnets. Like you do.

AND, here is another sunset. I will miss these a lot. Incredibly big sloppy smooches to the nice folks at The Bushwick Starr for giving us the opportunity and space for our work, and the opportunity to see these sunsets. It’s been so nice to look at America while we’ve been talking about the old gal. 

Well, I’m off to meet Michael so we can buy a lot of baloney and flav-or-ice. I’ve never had flav-or-ice. It sounds exciting, and strange. Just like America! 

xoxo,

Laura von Holt, Associate Artistic Director

June 28, 2012 | 04:30 PM | 2 notes

Day 8: America is fucked up, I sincerely love America, and hey, there’s an elephant in the room!

This is the wall where we taped up all of our brainstorming and other things we’ve generated. If we were to put this wall in MoMA, I would call the installation, “This is where the Unabomber lives.”
Anyway, I was going to summarize what we did on Tuesday, but instead I’m going to paste the electronic texts and Gchat conversations I had about it. My English teacher always said, “Show, don’t tell.” So here I am, showing you the elephant in the room, how much we love America, and how we are talking about things when we don’t know how to talk about them.
Sarah is our dramaturg/associate producer. I always turn to her when I want big words and interesting questions, so I G-chatted with her about Tuesday’s workshop. She is very helpful, and can Google like a motherfucker.

me: Yoo hoo hello. Soooo, I’m having some trouble summarizing what we did last night for the blog.
Sarah: Hm. Yes.
Well—where did we start?
like, even before what we did last night
me: Well, the last we left off was the monuments exercise
I explained that
Sarah: ok
me: but I didn’t say anything about the new lists
Sarah: but like way before this workshop the giant elephant in the room / on stage is how the hell we figure out what our portrayal of native americans is gonna look like
or, if we do it at all
or, how we make the play not about that
because there’s a really interesting history of portrayal of race on the american stage, but that might be a different play
me: right, and how we don’t wnat ot be so sensitive that it’s offensive in the other direction
like Disney’s Pocahontas
Sarah: right!
and the stuff we’ve been wrestling with in this process is so much more than that!
like, what is a museum?
what is history?
who tells a story and why?
why is america so interesting?
etc. etc.
me: right, but we can’t ignore elephant either
Sarah: so I think last night we started a kind of taxonomy of ways we relate to The American Indian
and then kind of divorced those stereotypes / assumptions / tropes / caricatures from the really loaded politics of it
 ?
or tried to?
is that even possible?
me: I don’t know. It might not be. I’m having a similar conversation with Michael over text right now
Sarah: oh whoops he texted me an hour ago and i just noticed
me: I wish we were in Hawaii. People just make fun of each other’s race’s and no one’s sensitive
Although no one makes fun of Hawaiians. Because Pele will get you, and it’s not nice.
Sarah: well, so the proper terror is instilled
me: exactly
Sarah: it’s a status thing…
 there aren’t reservations in HI are there?
me: no, there’s Hawaiian Homes lands, which are only for Hawaiian people to build homes
but it’s not like a segregated area with it’s own government
Sarah: huh
me: there’s not really enough space in Hawaii to have reservations
Sarah: right
me: also, by that time, America had already taken up all the land everywhere
Sarah: i mean also since it’s so small it’s just a more pervasive part of the culture right?
me: exactly
Sarah: WHY CAN’T WE ALL BE LIKE HAWAII???
me: I KNOW.
Like how we were saying that most of us didn’t have a personal relatonship to Native Americans
it was all from movies and child’s play, that’s not true in hawaii
Sarah: exactly
though i’m sure if we were making this play in new mexico it would be a different story
me: oh yes, that’s true.
Sarah: new york is kind of startlingly provincial sometimes
me: And America is so fucked up. I love America.
Really though, I think the white elephant is that we always make fun of our subject matter, but we’re usually making fun of the way the audience might expect to see the subject matter, but it’s hard to show people that really we are making fun of them, not what they’re seeing on stage.
Sarah: totally
it’s a fine line between making fun of people’s expectations about how indians are portrayed and making fun of indians
in other words
but then also, i do think we’ve found another bigger subject
which is about how fucked up america is and how we love it
and our way into that somehow is telling this story
and in telling this story we deal with the inciting incident in the whole terrible tragedy of native american - european relations in this country
by virtue of the way we work, we tell stories but we also are kind of obsessed with HOW they are told
so we have to deal with how that tragedy has been told for the last 400 years
(i.e., not as a tragedy…)
(also, in really horrible insensitive ways…)
and we take that and shape it in a way that is meaningful and revelatory to us
and hopefully to our audiences, who will be hopelessly implicated in the event
whatever it turns out to be
me: MUAHAHAHAHAHAH. SUCKERS! Thank you and goodnight!
Sarah: / / / / / bow and curtsy, bow and curtsy / / / /
is that how you spell curtsy?
what a weird word
me: I think that’s right.
Sarah: ANYWAYS
I dunno, does that help?
I think it helped me a little bit
me: Yes it helped. I basically arrived at the same conclusion with Michael over text. America is fucked up. We love it. And I want everyone to love America when they leave the play. I LOVE YOU AMERICA!!! Big sloppy smooches you batshit son of a bitch!
Sarah: Now shape up and be all we know you can be!
and get to the gym every once in a while, ya fat slob
etc. etc.
YES
go go go
me: AMERICA FOR THE WIN!!!
Sarah: the end.
me: Well, thank you Sarah. Your big words and thoughtful conversations are a comfort, as always.
Sarah: it’s why i’m here!
me: Dramaturg for the win!
ok, back to my day job! Wheee!
Sarah: me too!
me: Ok byyyeeeeeeeee.
Sarah: thx for writing this up!
me: cut, paste, blog, done!
MEANWHILE…I was having this conversation with Michael over text. But first, another sunset picture from the rooftop of the Bushwick Starr:
ML: america’s dirty little secret. donya as pocahontas. bound. gagged. kept in the shower of the upstairs bathroom. the third mrs karbunkle guides you over with a finger wave. glint in her eye imploring you to look. shhh! she says. shhh! nothing to see here, with a wink.

LVH: Ewwwww that is so creepy

ML: its the silencing of the native american voice. i feel like we r always having to watch ourselves. cant tell if that is good or not.

LvH: Oh! I thought it was like a horror movie & we were going to do something bad to poor Poca. I mean, my instinct is to be really racist because I think racism is hilarious, but at the same time I don’t want to make a play that’s about being really racist. Like I don’t want the only thing people remember about our show to be that it was funny racist. I want them to come out of it loving America.

ML: but is that forcing ourselves to work toward an end goal? loving america? america IS racist and fucked up

LvH: I know. I love it for those things. Like [REDACTED] loves her crack head ex boyfriend for being a fucked up crackhead because he’s so fascinating. This text coversation goes perfectly with the gchat I’m having with Sarah

ML: Add it in!

LvH: Yeah!!! But I will edit out [REDACTED]’s name

ML: i just feel like i need to walk on eggshells and sometimes i just need to go all out first before i pull back. america is dirty and secretive and complicated

LvH: I know what you mean. I’m feeling the need to act out so I can know I made the wrong choice & then find the more interesting choice

ML: exactly. and i feel like i need to be so cautious

LvH: Well we should talk about that. Like with the group. And then we can be like, uh, Michael & I are going to step out into the roof & be really racist. Just to get it out of our systems.

ML: and incluide all this in gchat. so meta!

…and then we continued over Gchat. And I had some bad ideas. And we loved America more:

me: to continue….
the expected thing to do would be to make something ironic about native americans, or be really sensitive, or try to be really authentic like New World Colin Farrell authentic.
the unexpected thing to do would be to ask a native american theater group what is the most offensive way they could imagine this story being told
and then do like half of it
or like pause the show and be like, and now we have real native americans here to tell their own story
and then be like, ok thank you for coming
and now
tiger lily does her dance
Michael: it’s not really so much about audience expectations i care about
if anything we’ve learned these past few days, it’s about how “personal” everyone’s perceptions of american history are
and how it’s all about how these personal stories get told
and how fucked up and dirty and messy and complicated and dark they are
so less about catering to an audience perception or expectation, i think it’s really good that we are exploring our own fucked up attitudes towards this material
wanting it to be easy
or wanting to run away from it
not being forced to be responsible
not get bogged down in being pc
not taking the easy offensive way out
and how does all of that get processed by each of us individually? and filtered? and what does that then generate?
me: and then does it get simplified and made into a myth
Michael: i don’t know if we need to simplify
i think the act of making this into a 90 minute piece of theater is simplifying enough
or at least constraining enough
me: no we don’t, I was just thinking about the way other myths get simplfied
Michael: i think they are being simplified by the way that we are perceiving them
or if not simplified, as least reduced to the essence
then those get layered to create something fraught with complications
me: mmm hmm
Michael: is that a good mm hmm? or a “not really sure what you’re talking about” mm hmm
me: that’s a “interesting” mm hmm
Michael: i mean fuck the story. if we call it pocahontas, then it’s about pocahontas even if there is no pocahontas, just us struggling with the idea of pocahontas
me: i get what you’re saying 
ooooo
Michael: pocahontas is the elephant in the room
me: like what if we fuck the story, fuck pocahontas, fuck john smith and then otehr things happen
Michael: or more exactly, the chick in the shower
peeling ears of corn
me: HAHA
so then are we just making up our own story?
Michael: I have no idea.
and BLACKOUT
a scene for our showing has just been written
i now need to go pay bills and write a contract
me: i need to go help the people exercise
Michael: we are doing good things
good american things
we should be proud
me: I am very proud of our american things
Michael: I AM ERICA!
me: I AM ERICA!*
So, that’s what that is, very transparently. In sum, we are considering the elephant in the room, and we love, love, love America. Here is another beautiful picture of a beautiful American sunset. AMERICA! 

xoxo,
Laura von Holt, Associate Artistic Director

*You may remember this sentence from previous blog posts. Somehow in one of the exercises, “America” became “My name is Erica,” and now when I say things like “I AM ERICA!” I am filled with a great sense of national pride. OMFG, I can’t stop loving America.

June 26, 2012 | 05:42 PM | 1 note

Day 7: Monuments, Histories and “My name is Erica”

Last night, we split up into three groups, took more words from our brainstormed lists, re-translated them and distilled them further. Each group took a bunch of these distilled words or phrases, and used them to create descriptions of three kinds of machines. They were: The Disassociator Machine, How To Tell The Truth, and How To Make Blossom Tea. From these, other groups interpreted these machines as landscapes. Then we switched and interpreted them as historic events, and finally, as monuments.

The monuments ended up being really creepy - cats spinning in a coffee percolator, a giant TV with the head of a green goddess, and a large diaphragm case that opened to reveal Mars that played a track of “My name is Erica” on repeat. Yikes! What have we done???!!!!  Apparently, our collective unconscious regarding America is really dark, a little fucked up, and pre-occupied with space exploration and zombies. Interestingly, together the monuments commemorated the full cycle of a civilization: origin story, revolution/transformation and destruction. 

What’s different about envisioning museums versus momuments is that museums are collections that tell part of a story, and much of the story is in the details, and the way the spaces and experiences are designed. Monuments, however, represent larger themes and events. I’ve often stared at the Statue of Liberty and other monuments and wondered, why the heck did they decide to make that, and why did they put it there? And now I know: no one really knows what they’re doing when it comes to monuments, but it all seems very tied to the feelings and themes of the era in which the monument is created. Also, people are weird, it’s hard to cut into stone, and feelings and history are messy and ugly. Thus, we have a lot of ugly monuments, and it’s impossible to capture all the complexity of people, countries and cultures in a durable figure, but we still try. Plus, it was really nice of those French people to give us that lady with the crown and the book by Ellis Island. I don’t think they had FedEx back then. I bet it was hard to ship.

So, that was our Monday night. Also, the sunset was gorgeous!

It’s fun to peek out the window and look at that crazy landscape of monuments. Here’s lovely Das taking a look.

And here’s me, Michael, Sarah and Jane, making shadow pictures on the wall with the twilight. I think we’re spelling out “Little Lord.” Or maybe we are showing our bodies as monuments to our own histories.

xoxo,

Laura von Holt, Associate Artistic Director

June 26, 2012 | 05:14 PM | 1 note

Day 6: A Playwriting Experiment

On Sunday, we took some of the material we had distilled on Saturday, split into two groups, and tried to write a play. We had four groups of notecards: one set we could use for dialogue, one to make characters, one that had to inform/become the actions and events of play, and one that had to be used as the rules of the world of the play. It was pretty hard to write a play with only, oh, thirty words of dialogue, but it made us be very creative with our stage directions. Each play was also assigned a title. Below are my favorite excerpts from each script:

“The Only Thing to Fear Is Fear Itself”

As they speak, they raise Chorus Leader to a God. She is now God B. This should look identical to God A on the pillar, only with people as the pillar.

She raises an iPhone 5.

CHORUS:

Internet.

SIRI says “Famous”


CHORUS

(repeats with reverence)

Famous.

ACT FIVE

They raise God B on their shoulders.  She manifests a feather boa from her vagina.

Any play where the iPhone 5 is raised to the level of deity is okay by me, and of course Siri’s prophecy would be about fame. Also, we are totally keeping that thing about God manifesting a feather boa from her vagina and using that in some play, somehow, somewhere. That’s a given, obviously.

“We Hold These Truths To Be Self Evident”

Setting: A large pot filled with the state of Oklahoma.

This was something written on a card, that at first I thought was crazy, but is one of those stage directions that could be interpreted in an amazing way - both metaphorically and theatrically. Also, once you have the state of Oklahoma in a pot, what do you do? Start filling it with water was the answer. Dramatic tension, people, dramatic tension is key.

There was also this character description:

Hollow Glory: A phantom, and the Goddess of Orgasm. Elemental. Intoxicating. Elegant. Weathered. Non-American.

Sounds like the type of character who would pull a feather boa out of her vagina, no? Weird how these coincidences happen.

And then there was this stage direction at the end, which I L-O-V-E LOVED:

The Statue of Liberty reassembles herself and floats away to New York.

Oh, and both plays were told to include this line:

SHITTY ON ITS FACE.

I’ll just let you imagine how we worked that in.

Here’s a picture from last week, when we moved rehearsal out to the roof because of the heat. Meg and Dan were reading each group’s invented Wikipedia entry about Pocahontas, and Sarah and I gave presentations on Jamestown versus Plymouth. We read by the light of our iPads and iPhone flashlight apps. Spooky.

xoxo,

Laura von Holt, Associate Artistic Director

June 23, 2012 | 11:40 PM | 1 note

Day 5: “To Find a Mundus Novus”

We’ve just finished Day 5 of our three-week residency at The Bushwick Starr, where we’re developing material for our un-titled show about Pocahontas and the founding myth of America. At each session, we gather with some trusted friends and collaborators and spend our time sifting through 400 years of source material, brainstorming ideas, and seeing where our collective imaginations will take us. 

During this residency, we’re trying to start from a blank slate, detach from all the historical research we’ve done, find new ways to connect to the story and new ways to tell the story. We began with listing and then categorizing questions and assumptions one might have when they go to see a play about the founding story of America. We spent a few days playing with myth-making and how “truths” get collectively written, and what elements are common amongst disparate versions.

Today, we took random selections from these categories of assumptions/questions, shuffled them around, and reinterpreted and translated them. Then we re-shuffled the translations, and ended up making three pieces of text, made from random phrases, kind of like writing with magnetic poetry. From these texts, we created three different scenarios of museums, complete with maps and gift shops. You probably didn’t follow all of that, because I barely did and I was there. But the point is, we re-shuffled/re-translated assumptions, and what we got were some lovely, dark, weird and incredibly poetic scenarios. The images and phrases sticking with me tonight are these:

  • —“To Find a Mundus Novus” or “To Find a New World” - A phrase based on a lost letter by Amerigo Vespucci about discovering the New World
  • —“Burned Museum” - Who knows how this phrase came about today, but I love the idea of having to make a story only from surviving artifacts - how would a story be written, or history told if the teller had no connection or prior knowledge to the material, only information gathered from artifacts found in the ashes, like making a play with only bone fragments from an archaeological dig? How do you tell a story when you only have half of it, and maybe all the true pieces have burned?
  • —“Choose only one.” - There are so many sides to a story. What if you are forced to stick to only one?

So, that’s what we thought about today. I’ll tell you more tomorrow.

Also, when it gets too hot, we move our sessions out onto the rooftop. Yep, we’ve got sunsets, rooftop access and interns. It’s pretty sweet. Thanks, Bushwick Starr!

xoxo,

Laura von Holt, Associate Artistic Director

June 23, 2012 | 08:12 PM |

Meg and Dan’s take on the story of Pocahontas

In 1690 an all-male group of English explorers arrive in Jamestown in order to reap the benefits of the New World.  A power struggle emerges when the royalist Lord Billingsly attempts absolute rule over the other men and instructs them to pillage, steal, and exploit the natives for all they are worth.  John Smith, enamored with the country he sees before him and disgusted with Lord Billingsly’s pursuits attempts a coup.  With a group of trusted allies he sets off for a more righteous exploration of the land.  However, to the natives the damage has been done, and in a case of mistaken identity, he is kidnapped and enslaved in the Powahawken village.  Appalled by the actions of both her tribe and the strangers, young Pocahontas, a girl of only 11 years, risks all in the name of a future peace.  At the moment the tomahawk begins to fall, she throws herself between the executioner and John Smith.  Valuing this act of bravery, and the wisdom of innocence, both the natives and the English have a moment of understanding and peace.  Their bond is forged in the righteous execution of Lord Billingsly, and peace prevails throughout the land.

June 23, 2012 | 08:11 PM |

Eileen’s take on the story of Pocahontas

Time: 1615
Place: outside Jamestown settlement in Virginia
English commercial merchants have just survived one of the most trying years of their lives, in the new land of Vir-gin-I-ay. The intrepid group has survived mosquitoes, horrible weather, and their own crown’s poor planning. They have suffered many hardships, and just when all hope seemed to have faded, in walked their saving grace: a young Powhatan Indian girl named Pocahontas. Pocahontas, the daughter of the Powhatan chief, helps the English grow crops, hunt, and defend themselves against the harsh climate. Follow the adventures of the Englishmen and their headstrong, brave, and clever guide, POCAHONTAS.

1 of 7 Old »